Subscribe to this blog

Subscribe to full feed RSS
What the? RSS?!

Subscribe Via Email

We respect your privacy.

World of Warcraft: Conquest – What Exactly IS Going On Here? ft. Dontain (WoW Gameplay/Commentary)

By admin On December 16, 2010 Under World of Warcraft

  

So if you don’t quite understand the conquest sysetem and how it works with current pvp systems (BGs, Rated BGs, and Area) then HERE is your one stop shop for all the new information AND some bizarr stuff going on in your local PvP Vendor Hall. LINKS ============================= I’m on facebook and Twitter! Stalk me for updates to pvp projects. www.facebook.com twitter.com Armory ============================= The proof is on the armory. us.battle.net

25 comments - add yours
RogTheLefty

December 16, 2010

That pvp set is the worst shit since George Bush

Zergal00

December 16, 2010

People used to cry because weapons and shoulders were high rated, because of the ”stat advantage” (even if this argument was laughable as far as shoulders goes). Blizard said ”Fine, we are going to let everyone and their dog acces to epic PvP gear, so you cry baby have no more freakin excuses for being bad, but good players still deserve a way to stick out of the crowd”, and thats exactly what the 3rd tier of gear is, a way for 2200+ players to stick out of the crowd, optional visual upgrade

Troldsk

December 16, 2010

Sir, please delete your WTF folder! or something…

JCA123Canoncompany

December 16, 2010

What I think is a fail… your helm looks 80% hunter wrathful helm…

tuschan60

December 16, 2010

woah, thats fucked up.

RightAsWrong

December 16, 2010

VLOOOOOOOOGGGGGSSSS

pensterasd

December 16, 2010

Hey man can u pm me a list of warrior adds u use please? It would be appreciated. thank you

IMvPI

December 16, 2010

You must not read posts, They did the gear this way to make all players equal. Gear shouldn’t have a stat change. It’s an advantage. That way there can be no bitching about silly stuff like gear being unequal. Weapons are the only thing that are going to have a stat change for 2200 players.

abejack123

December 16, 2010

its an EPIC FAIL! :)

AvastYeFailboat

December 16, 2010

@mecemical i guess….

EmmaSvanzGlyphs

December 16, 2010

wha(t) kind of mouse are you using?

Durzavon

December 16, 2010

Today I hooked up with another mage and we went frost/fire in arena 5-0
very fun to blow some people up :)
thanks dontain

ste8Utube

December 16, 2010

its not a bug but you do have a good point

randomframe

December 16, 2010

Dontain, What Are the reps I NEED To grind rep for?

randomframe

December 16, 2010

I don’t like the warrior gear at all : 3

mecemical

December 16, 2010

@coolbeans0325 It isnt a bug, it has been posted many times. High rating just means the glory of having a different colour. It’s so if you win you can still stand out but you wont have better gear because people didn’t like it that you needed rating to get the latest gears.

DrFeelgoood420

December 16, 2010

blizzard needs to pick up on creativity on their gear it sucks!!!

weknowme

December 16, 2010

90% of the 2v2 matches i’ve played (Holypally-AssRogue) have been against feral druid and frost mages, its getting super super annoying.

brekgar89

December 16, 2010

dontain, i went fury, currently we grinded to 1700 in 3s, farming rest of my bloodthirsty set during the weekend. and 2.2k during the next week

coolbeans0325

December 16, 2010

i fucking hope its a bug
christ

needhelpinwow

December 16, 2010

People bitched about rating being on gear so blizz made it so only t2 weps are different and the only difference is cosmetic from 2200+ players and everyone else. They made a post about this about 3+ months ago.

DuracellvsUrMom

December 16, 2010

2800(cata) is the new 2200(wotlk) so it is really easy to get to 2200 rating

arrowfluxx

December 16, 2010

green matches your tabard

hala4haters

December 16, 2010

<3

AntiHero36

December 16, 2010

the other gear dosent cost anything other then u have the first gear so it s just a color change witch requires no exstra work